The platform was born from the systemic reading of the wine supply chain.
CEFW allows us to observe the wine-system through its fundamental nodes, exploring its inputs and outputs.
The Systemic Approach is the basis for creating a relational network in which the output of one system becomes the input of another. It activates relationships between people, improves their well-being, improves the production system with the continuous transformation of matter and generates an economic flow that involves all the actors. In this sense, the value and cultural system of society will be spontaneously redefined for the purpose of the Common Good in which the environment in which one lives is naturally understood.[2] The concept of “Thinking in Systems”,[3] that is, the mental and cultural approach with which we should approach issues, it is essential to evolve our understanding of the food system as a whole. This type of thinking allows us to refine our ability to analyze individual components, to perceive interconnections and to develop creativity and courage in redesigning a food system that currently binds us to a linear economy.
The platform was designed based on the 'R paradigm' of the circular economy.
CEFW allows us to explore the circular practices applied to the wine-system, at various levels and on different scales, through the filter of the so-called R of the circular economy, theorized and accepted by the scientific community in 2017.[4]
In the era of the Capitalocene[5] a type of economy that embraces the systemic view, the collaborative approach and ecosystem awareness is more necessary than ever. The paradigm most entitled to adopt this posture is certainly the circular economy which, applied to food, takes on the contours of a holistic reflection, both on the health of humanity and on that of the planet (One Health).
To date, a unique definition of circular economy has not yet been shared in scientific literature, in fact, according to a 2017 study[6] There are at least 114. What was accepted by the research that led to the creation of this platform is the following:
“The circular economy is an economic system based on business practices and models that replace the concept of end of life with the reduction, creative reuse, recycling and recovery of materials in the production, distribution and use phases, operating at micro (people, products and businesses), meso (industrial parks) and macro (cities, regions, nations and beyond), with the aim of achieving sustainable development that involves creating environmental quality, economic prosperity and social equity for the good of present and future generations”
To which we would like to add: In addition, it provides that during the design phase it is possible to refuse (i.e. say 'no' to build alternatives), to rethink the way goods are used, reconsidering the concept of possession.

We have chosen to select and catalog circular practices related to the wine-system through the “9R paradigm” (Potting, 2017): these are ten action strategies aimed at generating circular production and use systems.
The 9Rs have a precise hierarchical order, from the most virtuous in terms of circularity to the most linear, and are divided into three categories based on the circular economy objective that they support:
This research also included the implementations within the framework of the 9R, proposed by Mercato Circular srl.[7]:
Finally, two new R's have been introduced, which do not exist in scientific literature, but arise from the need for research to enrich the technical-environmental contribution - brought by the 9R and referring to goods and services, with a component related to the sphere of social and civil impact, in line with the adopted definition of circular economy. Their goal is to create valuable relationships and transparent sharing of the impacts of their actions: Relate (R+) and Tell (R*): relating to return practices and disclosure of the impacts of the circular practices adopted.
Is it really necessary to produce this good?
Is it really necessary to own this asset?
It represents the ability to say 'no', refusing infinite growth and choosing the concept of limit as the central value of one's choices. The refusion, following a critical reflection of the linear system, is the first step towards new economic, cultural and social paradigms. By choosing to refuse, you avoid buying or producing new goods, not really necessary or whose function can be replaced by something already owned, to which you can have free access or on the market.
Strategy that invites us to look differently at the way in which we use (produce and consume) things, the amount of resources used and the waste produced. Rethinking means making use of a product by designing logics of sharing and renting products that allow goods not to be “dormant values”. It requires working on the creation of relationships between actors of the same territorial system. The related business models are: product as a service, based on the use of goods and not on their possession, and the models of sharing products.
Do you minimize the use of resources (especially non-renewable ones) to produce your goods?
Do you choose assets that guarantee the minimum waste of resources?
This “R” encompasses actions that aim to minimize environmental impact and waste in all phases of production and use of goods and services. It is implemented by reducing impacts and waste for greater process efficiency, optimizing the demands for materials and incoming energy. In addition to this, it proposes the adoption of circular inputs (both for the production of materials and energy) as strategic business factors (renewable and/or biodegradable inputs and/or inputs made from recycled matter, by-products, or recycled material).
Do you design and produce for the duration?
Do you encourage the exchange of your assets, once used?
If you no longer use an asset, why don't you loan/gift/exchange/resell it before throwing it away?
“Any operation through which products or components that are not waste are reused for the same purpose for which they were conceived” (Directive 2008/98/EC, art. 3, paragraph 13): such as second-hand markets, exchange practices, and gift giving.
Do you design and produce, whenever possible, rechargeable goods?
Can you avoid disposable or disposable items by replacing them with refillable goods?
Strategy that aims to ensure that an asset - designed to contain something - can do it repeatedly and for a long time, and not just once. This category includes bulk logistics, returnable vacuum and those strategies created to replace typically disposable products such as sanitary napkins, diapers with washable diapers or menstrual cups, or even disposable dishes with reusable dishes. For companies, it means structuring themselves internally and designing products that offer alternatives to disposable use.
Do you repair damaged goods and/or encourage your customers to repair or self-repair?
Is it enough for an asset to be damaged to consider it waste?
Do you repair or take damaged goods to repair before you dispose of them?
An operation through which broken and no longer functioning goods are put back into operation, so that they can be used with their original function.
Refurbish or regenerate assets?
Do you evaluate refurbished/refurbished goods before buying the new one?
It is a matter of restoring used products through a modernization process that involves the replacement of old and/or worn parts as new parts and provides for the issuance of a warranty, as for the new one. For the two practices to have maximum effectiveness, it becomes important that the products are designed according to the criterion of modularity and easy disassemblability, thanks to which individual components can be easily removed, repaired, replaced.
Can you recognize and generate new value from waste?
Repurposing involves a process of transforming an asset or material (no longer functioning for the purpose for which it was created), so that it acquires greater use value (upcycling). This can happen without modifying the material, as in the case of an old barrel that becomes a bar table; or, it can happen by intervening on the material of which a good is made, for example as when the waste of citrus fruits becomes an input for the creation of a new type of paper, instead of simply being composted. The principles of upcycling (McDonough & Braungart, 2013) find application in industrial symbiosis, which, through the exchange of resources and by-products, aims to develop synergistic and profitable collaborations between companies.
Do you create, or do you make it create, new matter from discarded goods?
Do you do a correct separate collection, so that the discarded material can be valued?
“Any recovery operation through which waste materials are reprocessed to obtain products, materials or substances to be used for their original function or for other purposes. It includes the reprocessing of organic material but not the recovery of energy nor the reprocessing to obtain materials to be used as fuels or in filling operations” (Directive 2008/98/EC, art. 3, paragraph 17). There are two types of recycling:
• post-consumer: refers to products that have reached the end of their useful life, which in turn can be managed through closed cycles (by the same manufacturing company) or through open cycles (separate collection system)
• pre-consumption: refers to the recovery of production waste or scrap.
Do you recover energy value from waste?
Is what you are throwing in the unsorted waste truly and entirely non-recyclable?
Is what I'm throwing in the unsorted bin really and entirely non-recyclable?
Do you create, nurture and encourage valuable relationships that can contribute to public happiness?

This “R” does not exist in scientific literature, it is a proposal created within the reflections of NODES research to enrich the “10R” model (of a technical nature and referring to goods and services) of a component related to the sphere of social and civil impact and thus make it more consistent with the definition of 3C for CEFF. It investigates quality before quantity, and the type of relationships that production models trigger and maintain with and between living people (workers, boards, suppliers, investors, end users, policymakers, retailers, disposal workers, volunteers, community close to production sites, extended community, flora and fauna). This discourse includes various economic, political and cultural factors that determine relational dynamics: contracts, relational times and spaces, training, space for personal flourishing, enhancement of gender equity, care for communication methods and transmission of information in/outside reality, ethical certifications, manifesto of values, code of ethics, commitment to impact assessment, etc.
Am I aware of the impacts generated by my circulation?
Do I collect and disseminate stories capable of inspiring and encouraging the circular transition?

“Accountability” for the results and impact of circular practices, or of experimentation and research on the subject, is a way to share perspectives, goals (and failures) that contribute to a sustainable way of doing business, but also of inspiring and encouraging other stakeholders.
La grafica e le presentazioni delle R sono riconducibili al lavoro di disseminazione di Mercato Circolare srl Società Benefit, e ulteriormente arricchite da riflessioni emerse durante la ricerca.